<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chinmay&#039;s blog &#187; web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinmaykulkarni.info/blog/tag/web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinmaykulkarni.info/blog</link>
	<description>It&#039;s a feature, not a bug!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:14:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The changing nature of Web search</title>
		<link>http://www.chinmaykulkarni.info/blog/2010/01/the-changing-nature-of-web-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinmaykulkarni.info/blog/2010/01/the-changing-nature-of-web-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chinmay Kulkarni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinmaykulkarni.info/blog/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, John Hoproft (yes, the algorithms guy) visited the lab. Over a very interesting lunch, he posed the question &#8220;Where do you folks see web search heading over the next few years?&#8221;.
Of course, there was a reason behind the question: &#8220;You know, as web search engines get better, people will stop creating links <a href="http://www.chinmaykulkarni.info/blog/2010/01/the-changing-nature-of-web-search/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, <a title="John Hopcroft: Cornell page" href="http://www.cs.cornell.edu/jeh/" target="_blank">John Hoproft</a> (yes, the <a title="John Hopcroft: from Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hopcroft" target="_blank">algorithms guy</a>) visited the <a title="Microsoft Research" href="http://research.microsoft.com/" target="_blank">lab</a>. Over a very interesting lunch, he posed the question &#8220;Where do you folks see web search heading over the next few years?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Of course, there was a reason behind the question: &#8220;You know, as web search engines get better, people will stop creating links and simply use web search to locate the most relevant information [link directories, Yahoo's original business, are nearly dead today; for example]. But today&#8217;s search engines depend on links for their search quality.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a point here. It&#8217;s almost chicken-and-egg, but in reverse.</p>
<p>But then, I remembered SEO: a whole industry is out there, creating the right links! Dr H, however, differed &#8220;Well, a few years ago, when I searched for recipes, I&#8217;d find some special recipes created by people that they&#8217;d put on their homepage. Today, I reach a grocery store&#8221;.</p>
<p>Search engines want to make sure they aren&#8217;t being manipulated by SEO, so the practice has become a race of sorts between the SEO industry and search engines (Meta tag keywords are nearly <a title="Google does not use meta keyword tags" href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html" target="_blank">useless now</a>, for example). Grandmas with secret recipes don&#8217;t stand a chance in this gruesome battle.</p>
<p>This tussle between various entities which try and optimize search rankings for commercial interests, coupled with the tragedy of the commons (due to which &#8220;normal&#8221; people will slowly stop linking) creates an interesting scenario: I wonder if the search engines of tomorrow will be a lot <em>less powerful</em> than they are today. Maybe, they could reduce to a librarian of sorts&#8211; pointing you in the general direction where you could learn more, but leaving it to the reader to find the exact book she wants.</p>
<p>This is, of course, the opposite of Universal Search, the holy grail that major search providers are gravitating towards, but one can already see the signs of this development: when I wanted Wordpress themes for this blog, for instance, Google first pointed me to Smashing Magazine. Once at the site, I used Smashing&#8217;s search engine to find the theme (in the end I didn&#8217;t use it though: just went with a default for now)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve encountered similar situations yourself (searching for travel destinations, restaurant reviews, code samples&#8230;), and it would be interesting to know what you think of this problem too. Comment below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinmaykulkarni.info/blog/2010/01/the-changing-nature-of-web-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
